Essay on Rhetorical Analysis on High School - 646 Words

High school, the best times of our lives. But in every situation others don’t experience it as the time of their lives. In specific, the so called, â€Å"Loser, Nerds, Outcasts. Sometimes the perception that most high school movies convey for this certain group are the reality. In this article High school confidential: Notes on teen movies by David Denby, He describes the functions of an everyday American high school. David Denby uses very effective language and rhetoric to provide the minds of the opposing side. A sample of the rhetoric skills he uses is stereotypes, ethos, and pathos. The most disliked teenager that runs the halls is a popular blonde-.... Shes tall and slender, with a waist as supple as a willow... slatternly tongue†¦show more content†¦He has firsthand experience the life inside of high school, so he must have seen these type of characters when he was in high school. So what reasons wouldn’t give us the mind set of trusting someone that’s experienced the high school life? This is why his ethos is so important in opposing the other side. He also uses pathos very well through the columbine shooting.†The enemy is other teens and the social system that they impose on one another.† The teens that impose such a system are the ones that were named in this essay. And this system is imposed through insults. But one can only take so much, and that is what happened in the Columbine shooting. These â€Å"gothic† kids were under attack by the popular group, and pushed them to the edge to where they believe that doing such cruel acts could somehow with the satisfaction of revenge. It is horrifying to realize that teens are so heartless, but that is what has happened. This is not only emotionally effective to the reader, but also logically. Because if you think about it, Denby imposes his statement that there is the popular bitch, the jock, and says that they are pushing a social system. So this just reassures the fact that what Denby describes is true and happens every day with the halls of high school without outsidersShow MoreRelatedImproving The Work Force Of Apprenticeships820 Words   |  4 Pagesthe readers by using the rhetorical analysis using logos, ethos, and pathos. Robert I. Lerman is in favor of using apprenticeships in today’s workforce for millions of Americans. He uses rhetorical analysis to appeal to the readers. The first one is pathos which is using feelings, desires, or fears to influence readers. â€Å"A large-scale apprenticeships system will help the United States deal with several chronic problems. They include disengagement among high school students; stagnant wages amongRead MoreReflection About Reading And Reflection1090 Words   |  5 PagesWhen I first received my classes for the fall semester of 2017, I noticed the class titled: Introductory College Writing. I instantly rolled my eyes and felt annoyed. Even though English as my favorite subject in high school, my favorite part of English was the reading aspect; I have always loathed the writing portion of English. My expectations in this class was I was going to write about a whole bunch of nonsense and hope to pass. But after participating in this course my expectat ions were thrownRead MoreSelf-Reflective Essay1685 Words   |  7 Pagesknowledge on rhetorical strategies and how to present arguments effectively. In the writings I have written, I feel that each writing works towards meeting the course goals. Logos, ethos, and pathos were strategies and ideas we were introduced to (if not already in the past) and were built upon throughout the quarter. The knowledge gained over the course of the quarter werent only those three types of appeals. Rhetorical strategies like proposals helped reinforce the course and using rhetorical analysisRead MoreEnglish Reflection1351 Words   |  6 Pagesbeing a high school level writer to a college-level writer. However, English 10 has by far been my best experience in writing. By taking this course I have retrieved many helpful elements, that will help me become a successful writer throughout college. In high school, essays often gave me stress and anxiety, however, when taking English 10, I was able to lear n to enjoy the process of writing purposefully and mindfully. Even though, I have taken advanced placement English courses in high school and haveRead MoreRhetorical Analysis : The Rhetorical Triangle 1129 Words   |  5 Pagesbefore I first walked in here. I personally feel that I have made an improvement in the acknowledgment I had in writing. One of the major writing principles that I will never forget is the rhetorical triangle for example, logos, ethos, and pathos make up the rhetorical triangle I used in my Rhetorical Analysis Essay. To illustrate this in the beginning of Tatum’s article she attempts to use logos to demonstrate her own view on racism. She believes racism is â€Å"a term used only for behaviors committedRead MoreSymbolic Convergence in Gossip Girl: The Fantasy of the â€Å"In Crowd†1665 Words   |  7 PagesFrom high school girls desperately trying to be one of cool kids in school to corporate warriors rubbing elbows for that next promotion, n early everyone has fantasized about being a part of the â€Å"in crowd†. What is it that makes the bonds and barriers of â€Å"in crowd† so unbreakable? Through sharing stories and reaching conclusions through discussion of those stories, members of small groups develop a common bond that shapes their social reality. An example of this bond is prominent in the CW’s hit showRead MoreHow College Composition Has Helped Me Grow Tremendously As A Writer1456 Words   |  6 Pagesright direction that high school never did. When I was in high school I had about a month total of grammar over those 4 years so writing was not a big part of my life at that point. Due to that, I knew coming into Comp 1 that I would struggle to produce something worth reading at first. Through countless revisions and reflections on each paper I have learned so much about the process of writing in such a short time. One major disadvantage of not writing a lot in high school was that there was noRead MoreRhetorical Strategy Of Ethos In Lean On Me By Joe Clark850 Words   |  4 PagesJoe Clark, our main protagonist in Lean on Me, uses the rhetorical strategy of ethos on several occasions. One example is when he makes his first major decision by expelling all the drug dealers and delinquents from the school within the first day of him being in charge. This demonstrates his credibility as an authority figure, given that he has the power to eliminate those bad influences from his school now that he is in charge. He was aggressive with his approach, but he gained the attitude ofRead MoreHow Rhetoric Is Required For Every College Student1566 Words   |  7 Pagescollege student in order for them to write an academic essay. In college writing, many professors wants us, as students, to actually write a college paper, not an informal paper that may be accepted in high school. de the reader feel that w e know what we need to write and how to write rhetorical awareness is important for multilingual writer. Because The instructor want us to be able use our own knowledge and demonstrate our own skills while writing. Consequently, the more practice we have, theRead MoreClass Based On Several Elements1463 Words   |  6 PagesIn a Nutshell group work assignment I participated in it and did not let just one person do all of the work. I rate myself an 8 in this area because I participated in the group work and did the second to most work in it. The first couple weeks of school I did not have my books because I did not have the money to buy them. After those first couple of weeks though I came to class prepared every time that the class met. I did very well in this area and rate myself a 9 because I had my books, binder

Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Can Be Fun for Everyone

Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Can Be Fun for Everyone What You Should Do to Find Out About Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Before You're Left Behind This can help you to anticipate any possible holes or weaknesses in your opinion or argument. To genuinely understand what you argue, it's essential to be acquainted with opposing arguments. In order to genuinely understand what you're arguing for or against, it is crucial that you fully grasp the opposing arguments of your topic. Acknowledge the last opinions or arguments made on the exact subject issue. Finally, your conclusion is merely a summary. Check the newest insanity on Twitter. Write two sentences to spell out the 2 sides of the present circumstance. Preferably, place each opinion in a different paragraph. Whispered Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Secrets The purpose of love is to discover that special someone whereby you will devote the remainder of your life with. It is meant to be not arranged. Falling in love is a superb experience for everybody. The third sentence says what you're likely to do. The Fundamentals of Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Revealed Usually, opinion essay topics ask that you present your point of view on a specific matter. Speaking about delicacy, it's a fundamental portion of any essay. Opinion essays are usually believed to be part of the argumentative essays. Writing an essay about your views may appear to be easy, as you simply need to rely on yourself as the principal resource person. Writing editorials is a rather tough endeavor. The ideas below function as a handy guide whenever you're writing your opinion essay. Kibin editors are almost always prepared to help. Take a look at the arguments made before and find out how they fit in with your opinion in the context in which you're writing. The key point here is you, as a student, should be prepared to write on such a topic. Therefore, many students and employees decide to purchase low-cost essay rather than writing it themselves. Try out this opinion essay question about the price of space exploration. The Tried and True Method for Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay in Step by Step Detail On the other, it's a method of life. If you're a victim of forced marriage, happiness will be difficult for you to find. You have the chance to express your thoughts freely. Getting our help permits students to acquire high grades and conserve time. The Number One Question You Must Ask for Samples of Nyt Opinion Essay Also, on our blog, you can come across a great deal of different samples for various disciplines. By beginning with acknowledgment of the opposing opinion, you're assuring your readers which you've taken the opportunity to take the complete breadth of the topic under consideration. In various periodicals, you can discover tons of articles containing people's opinions and attitudes towards various troubles. Collect research to back up your opinion. The sample below will supply you with an opinion paragraph example structure to assist you write your essay. To do so, we offer not merely our service to supply you with a written material, yet to supply you with written material that will be appropriate for you in every way possible. But there continue to be people who can't write papers by themselves even should they have samples. Get any material you will need at no cost. For instance, one of the patients is afflicted by cancer, and we all understand that this sort of illness is quite pricey and only upper class can afford the therapy. To start with, regular exercise has a vital role in weight management. Exercise is thus very crucial in disease prevention and healthful living. Normal exercise boosts energy naturally and is thus a nutritious option In conclusion the advantages of normal exercise on human health cannot be overlooked. This will provide a paper a superb flow and will help it become simple to read. You would like an outline first. Inside this portion of your work, you have to create a content which will be utilised in your body paragraph. To begin with, you should conduct your studying to support a personal stance.

Aristotle vs Plato Essay Example For Students

Aristotle vs Plato Essay Aristotle refutes Platos Theory of Ideas on three basic grounds: that the existence of Ideas contradicts itself by denying the possibility of negations; that his illustrations of Ideas are merely empty metaphors; and that they theory uses impermanent abstractions to create examples of perception. Though the theory is meant to establish concrete standards for the knowledge of reality, Aristotle considers it fraught with inconsistencies and believes that the concept of reality depends upon all forms correlations to other elements. Ideas, Plato believes, are permanent, self-contained absolutes, which answered to each item of exact knowledge attained through human thought. Also, Ideas are in Platos view concrete standards by which all human endeavor can be judged, for the hierarchy of all ideas leads to the highest absolute that of Good. In addition, the theory claims that states of being are contingent upon the mingling of various Forms of existence, that knowledge is objective and thus clearly more real, and that only the processes of nature were valid entities. However, Aristotle attacks this theory on the grounds that Platos arguments are inconclusive either his assertions are not al all cogent. Aristotle says, or his arguments lead to contradictory conclusions. For example, Aristotle claims that Platos arguments lead one to conclude that entities (such as anything man-made) and negations of concrete ideas could exist such as non-good in opposition to good. This contradicts Platos own belief that only natural objects could serve as standards of knowledge. Also, Aristotle refutes Platos belief that Ideas are perfect entities unto themselves, independent of subjective human experience. Ideas, Aristotle claims, are not abstractions on a proverbial pedestal but mere duplicates of things witnessed in ordinary daily life. The Ideas of things, he says, are not inherent to the objects in particular but created separately and placed apart from the objects themselves. Thus, Aristotle says, Platos idea that Ideas are perfect entities, intangible to subjective human experience, is meaningless, for all standards are based somewhere in ordinary human activity and perception. Thirdly, Aristotle assails Platos efforts to find something common to several similar objects at once, a perfect exemplar of the quality those things share. Beauty is a perfect example; Plato considered Beauty both a notion and an ideal, isolated by abstractions and fixed permanently while its representatives fade away. Aristotle claims that abstractions like Beauty cannot be cast as absolutes, independent of temporal human experience; the Idea of Beauty changes with time and individual perceptions and cannot (as Plato felt) exist forever as a concrete standard. Plato and Aristotle reach some agreement, though, on the topic of reality. Plato believes that all reality was derived from his Ideas (which themselves dealt with concrete hierarchy of rational ideas. St. Anselm, though, makes the most dogmatic and logically tortuous case for Gods existence, relying not upon explanations of goodness, truth, or rational order of ideas but upon an absurd argument. He claims that everyone has some sense of God, and he claims that for one to deny Gods existence is an invalid and contradictory assertion; therefore, God exists. Also, Anselm believes that those capable of understanding God cannot believe that he does not exist as if the enormity of the idea was so clear than only a fool could not perceive it. His arguments seem the weakest of the four viewpoints here, for they are riddled with dogma and assume that God is a constant using faith alone. Anselm considers faith paramount to logic or other forms of thought and asks no questions as to what powers the universe or what goodness is he basically follows the Christian party line too closely to be valid. In general, St. Augustine combines Platos idea of a moral hierarchy with his own rational observations of truth and goodness being embodied in their highest form by God. While Plato wavers on Gods superiority, Aristotle views man as gods pawn, and Anselm uses tortuous dogmatic logic, Augustines arguments seem to make the most sense from not only a Christian point of view but from a moral and rational one as well. .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .postImageUrl , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:hover , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:visited , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:active { border:0!important; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:active , .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708 .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u40d5c576e6f43ba7e4b1e901c5c40708:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: William Henry Gates III Essay The philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, and St. Anselm on the existence of God all vary on the issue of Gods nature; though each thinker takes a different approach to why there is a God, that of St. Augustine seems the most valid because he takes a rational stance and does not dogmatically assume Gods existence. Platos philosophy assumes that God exists as a supremely good being whose goodness is analogous to Platos concrete concept or the ultimate good. However, God and goodness are not one and the same; Plato does not directly state that goodness is good, but that God is good, since he exemplifies the idea at the top of Platos hierarchy. In short, God does not equal goodness, but God encompasses it better than any other being. This implies not that God is perfect, but that Gods intentions and actions have good aims goodness may emerge from other sources besides God. The main problem with Platos philosophy is his inconsistency; he owes the existence of his Ideas to both God and goodness, but he claims the two are not identical. God becomes subordinate to the universals in Platos ordered cosmos, and his defense of God appears rather weak. While Plato assumes God exists as the ultimately good (but not omnipotent) being, Aristotle questions Gods active role in the universe and claims that nature depends upon an immaterial Supreme Being. For example, he cites natural genesis and the perpetuity of movement as evidence of Gods immaterial existence, and he implies that God is a self-sufficient, compelling force for both nature and man. Aristotles concept of God seems valid as a pre-scientific explanation of the universe; however, he seems to ignore Gods embodiment of moral goodness and mans ability to think and act freely and still be good. He believes that all goodness comes from within God and that the goodness in man is drawn toward God and nothing else. Aristotles ideas on God seem, from a modern point of view, effective only as explanations of the supernatural and even of the miracle of life. St. Augustine links God with rational thought and states that human knowledge of truth depends upon mans relationship to God. His argument moves him from existence of the self to the objectivity of truth and finally to Gods reality. Augustine assumes that God is a rational being and that the rational and the good are identical. Only God could be superior to truth, he says, and therefore must be the ultimate good; therefore, truth, goodness, and God are one and the same. His argument seems fairly clear-eyed and rational, for he does not approach Gods goodness dogmatically or automatically assume Gods existence. Instead, he works toward that end by evaluation the rationality of truth and goodness, and he casts God in that role as the ultimate embodiment of both. In general, Augustine implies, God represents goodness and occupies the pinnacle of the concept like unity and twoness). He considers unity and goodness the combined center of his system of Ideas and stated that the Ideas had to be more real and concrete than any objects of ordinary experience. Aristotle, meanwhile, agreed with Platos notion that the immaterial (form) and the material (matter) were distinctly separate entities; however, he did not share Platos belief that all forms were permanent, freestanding truths; he felt that form correlated to matter. Ideas, he stated, correlated to something material and were thus changeable and often dependent upon the observer. In general, Aristotle refutes Plato on the grounds that his Theory of Ideas tries too hard to establish concrete, universal definitions for things that depend too much on the material. Though both thinkers agree on the separation of the material and immaterial (which gave both a somewhat similar view of God), they still differ sharply over the permanence of standards by which human nature and endeavor can be judged. .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .postImageUrl , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:hover , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:visited , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:active { border:0!important; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:active , .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u13c78ca25b4908c74655da3c1e9f81bb:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Salem Witch Trials Essay Bibliography:

Magwitch-a criminal Essay Example

Magwitch-a criminal Paper Dickens uses of short, descriptive sentences help to achieve these visions. Magwitch is a colourful, cunning and manipulative character, yet he loosens up his anger slightly towards Pip, when he learns that he is an orphan. It may show that Magwitch is an orphan too, and so shows slight sympathy towards him. Dickens may also be implying that Magwitch was provoked to turn to crime, as a result of becoming an orphan- fending for his self. This signifies a (very) subtle change in a relationship that was full of fear and intimidation, to one with a form of dependence, and some sympathy attached alongside it too. Pip agrees to follow the commands of Magwitch-a criminal, and therefore despite not really knowing, performing a noble act. In chapter 2, Dickens delves deeper into investigating the life of a typical orphan; in the era. We learn more about the harsh realities of life for an orphan. If you werent killed by the numerous epidemics around, then you were considered lucky. Ironically, the situation is written about quite comically to lessen the impact of the powerful opening chapter. Pip lives with his abrupt, and shrewish sister, Mrs Joe Gargery-who now looks after him, and her husband, Joe Gargery, who is a blacksmith. Pip is regularly the victim of angry beatings delivered by his sister, who has established a reputation by bringing Pip up by hand. Knowing her to have a heavy hand and to be much in the habit of laying it upon her husband as well as upon me, I suppose that Joe Gargery and I were brought up by hand. We will write a custom essay sample on Magwitch-a criminal specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Magwitch-a criminal specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Magwitch-a criminal specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The channelling of problems faced in childhood evokes feelings of sympathy from the reader towards Pip- Dickens successfully does this to make the reader see that society was unjust, he explores this further through out the story. Mrs Joe isnt afraid to let Pip know that she thinks of his as a burden, and so uses him as a cannonball, she regrets looking after him. If it wasnt for me youd have been to the churchyard long ago, and stayed there. Who brought you up by hand? And why I did it, I should like to knowId never do it again! I know that. Mrs Joe believes that Pip should be grateful to her for what she has done for him. She is also quick to say that she is ashamed of her situation. It is bad enough to be a blacksmiths wife (and him a Gargery), without being your mother. This shows that Mrs Joe feels burdened by her position-looking after Pip, she is continuously working. Pip and Joe are in understanding of each others situations and so try to make the best of their situation. Joe tries to protect Pip, rather than lashing out on him too. When Pip hides some bread for Magwitch, Joe thinks that he has been bolting (swallowing without chewing). Mrs Joe makes both Pip and Joe drink repulsive tar-water (disinfectant mixture-wood tar); the cruel conditions of childhood are again depicted. In Dickens view of childhood, he felt that children have certain needs: guidance in a nurturing home, to be free from emotional and physical abuse, to have a good education, and to be allowed to be happy. Lack of parental love and support; in these circumstances have inclined Pip to long for a better future for himself, thinking it be possible if he can become a gentleman, he tries to pursue this ambition. Firing from the Hulks announces the escape of another convict. At dawn he steals food and a file, and hurries to meet the convict, despite his conscious questioning him-he feels that this is a criminal act, although he still carries it out. Chapter 3 opens to a rimy (frosty), miserable morning, where key events are about to occur. Pips guilty conscience is exposed, he thinks that his surroundings are talking to him, everything seemed to run at me and accusing him of crime. The gates and the dykes and banks came bursting at meA boy with somebody-elses pork pie! Stop himThe Cattle came upon me with like sadnessHolloa young thief! Dickens shows through the narrative, that he knew how children thought, and so the reader is able to enter Pips mind and see the world through the eyes of a child. Pip sees another convict in the dangerous fog and escapes from him, assuming that he is the murderous young man Magwitch mentioned was with him. The first convict-Magwitch is waiting for Pip. He devours the food with animal relish, and works to remove the leg iron with the file. He shows a different side of emotions when Pip comes back to meet him, and gives him food, something clicked in his throat as if he had works like a clock, and was going to strike. The usage of a metaphor tries to convey the fact that his burst of softer emotions is surprising, as he has presented his intense, and angry side, the narrative suggests that his presence is not human like, more like a machine. Alliteration helps to pinpoint this And he smeared his ragged rough sleeve over his eyes. Pips fear of him is mixed with pity, pitying his desolation, and watching him as he gradually settled down. The convict had obviously invented the young man to frighten Pip. Their relationship has shifted at this point-its a landmark. Magwitch doesnt act violently towards Pip (although he when he hears about another convict he gets angry-suggesting a mysterious connection between them), although the element of violence is still mentioned. He shivered all the while so violently and He was already handling mincemeat down his throatmore like a man putting it away somewhere in a violent hurry, than a man eating it. This shows us that Magwitch has indecisive violent qualities. Magwitchs almost unsettled state is highlighted again. His manners are compared to that of dogs. The politeness of Pips sympathetic conversation with the convict is an attempt to normalise an abnormal situation, but also, as recognition of the convict as a fellow human being. He is becoming somewhat comfortable with the situation now. Pip: I was glad you enjoyed it (the food Pip bought for Magwitch). Magwitch even thanks Pip, thus creating a noticeable change in their relationship-it is significant. Pips initial referral to Magwitch as my convict shows that an emotional bond/relationship between them is felt and has formed incomparison to previous fear. Pip leaves Magwitch to work on his leg-iron with the file, whilst he runs back home (for Christmas). In Chapter 4, at the forge an abundant dinner is held. Pip has got a guilty conscious, and is feeling terrified that his theft will be discovered. The tar-water that Pip substituted for the stolen brandy is drunk, and the pork pie cant be found. When Pip finally runs for the door but is met by a soldier bearing a pair of handcuffs. We are faced with the worrying question will Pip be arrested for his act? This end on a note of suspense reminds us that Dickens was writing to please a wide audience. In chapters 5-6, we learn that Joe is asked to repair the broken handcuffs. Everyone is forced to follow the soldiers on the search for the convicts, although Pip is reluctant-and worried about what Magwitch will think. Would he believe that I was both imp and hound in treacherous earnest, and had betrayed him? Pip is clearly feeling anxious and guilty about the situation, he is unsure about what may happen to both himself and Magwitch. The convicts are eventually found. Our curiosity about the convicts is aroused when one of them is called a gentleman-a topic that is at the core of the story is questioned. We see Joes humanity when he recognises Magwitch as a poor miserable fellow-creatur. Joe says We dont know what youve done, but we cant have you starve to death for itCould we Pip? to Magwitch. The reader learns that Pip gains his good morals and humanity from Joe, and his teachings. Dickens tries to bring into view of the audience that many convicts like Magwitch) werent necessarily bad people, you should consider that they may have been driven to commit crimes. Before being rearrested and taken back to the Hulks, Magwitch admits that he has stolen food from the forge, but doesnt reveal that Pip helped him; this public spew of protection shows gratitude and reassurance between the pair. Their relationship is still developing, and there has been a rapid shift since their first encounter the previous day, where a whirlwind of violence, and tension was displayed. Since the morning their relationship and attitude has turned into something more meaningful-loyalty has been conjured up; Proving that Magwitch must have been really touched when he was shown kindness from Pip. Criminals like Magwitch were pushed to the bottom of society. It was rare to see any affection shown towards them, as they were treated so badly. Magwitch shows emotion when kindness is shown to him from Pip and Joe. The something I had noticed before, clicked in the mans throat again, and he turned his back. Magwitchs turn around implies that he doesnt really want to show his softer emotions, this may be because criminals were believed to be hard and their emotions werent taken into consideration, as if they lacked them. Pip decides not to confide in Joe about his own part in the theft either; this signifies the start of a break between them.